a cache of captured internet text files pertaining
to occult, mystical, and spiritual subjects.
To: alt.magick.tyagi,alt.thelema,alt.magick,talk.religion.misc,talk.religion.newage,alt.wicca,alt.religion.wicca From: SChevalier (email@example.com) Subject: Initiation Date: 24 Jul 1999 02:22:12 -0700 93. Disclaimer: all views herein are just Mine, and are drawn from experience with O.T.O. initiation (both giving and receiving). I have never taken outward initiation from other initiatory systems, though in the case of the A.'.A.'. I may one day elect to rectify that situation. Fiona Dearest wroteth: >>>What do you think the purpose of initiation is? The "purpose" (in My view) is to magickally plant and catalyze a "seed" experience which is intended to grow into increasing gnosis, inner realization, awareness and insight. When it is done successfully, your candidates will be calling, emailing, or pulling you aside at meetings to say things like, "I have GOT to talk to you about the stuff that's been happening with me ever since I took my (whatever) degree ..."
>>>Why don't you think that identical initiation patterns/ritual will >>>work for everyone that applies for them? I'm still undecided about My own view on this. I lean toward perceiving that they *do* work, though every individual will have his/her own unique slant of perception on precisely *what* is whatever degree "working out in their lives". I like this broad aspect of the initiatory experience: there are enough focused points and cohesive substance in a degree to produce some across-the-board touchstones of similarity, yet enough openness for any degree to tailor itself to the individual's experience as well. So everyone's initiation into, say, II* in O.T.O. is both the same, and yet different for each unique Star even though the same ritual was used. >>>What do you think is the essence of initiation then? I view initiation in a couple ways. One is as a catalyzing experience which, through a combination of factors present in the initiatory process itself, sets off a "chain reaction" which interfaces with the candidate's existing paradigm(s) in such a way as to simultaneously expand, focus and clarify his/her perception of experiences past, present and yet to come. Another way I view initiation is like downloading a "zipped" (PC users) or "bin-hexed" (Mac users) file of gnosis that is gradually unpacked, opened, read, and put to use in the timespan which follows. >>>And what is the purpose of any symbolism thrown into initiation >>>experience? I see symbolism itself as a vital and indispensible "mapping tool" of the magickal, mystical realms of gnosis. In this respect, individual symbols and individual applications of "universal" symbols are important to the unfolding of an individual's path in life and his/her journey thereon. Shared symbolism within a community, however, and shared agreement upon at least the functional basis of that symbolism for at least the time the community interacts, is part of the magick that takes place to create community bonding, and to make each individual's experience of the Mysteries uniquely richer and sweeter by adding the transcendent experience in a shared context. Shared symbolism provides a common-interface paradigm wherein we can discuss our experiences and perceptions with one another with at least a reasonable expectation of understanding what each other is talking about from within our own internal (and widely differing!) "worlds" of individual perception and assigned meaning/significance. I know some people don't put much stock in the mysteries of shared community. Some view it suspiciously as a potential tool for "herd making" and prefer to go it alone (or so they imagine -- IMO you only TRULY "go it alone" when you live on fully owned-outright land with your own electrical generator, water supply, livestock, and crops with no paycheck and no helping hands for all that and sew all your own clothes and build all your own tools and toys, not to mention cure all your own ailments, fill all your own cavities, and fuck yourself with a vibrator you built!) I, obviously, do not share that view, and think some have done the exquisite mystery of community a disservice thereby to their own loss, but that's another story for another day. >>>I am also interested in whether people's opinions of the *purpose* of >>>initiation is different after the event to what it was before. For Me, *after* the event was when I first had ANY opinions on its purpose(s). Before that, it was just a mystery to Me, and I never even thought about whether it had a "purpose" cuz I didn't even know what "it" was. I think when I went into it I had some vague notion of notifying the universe that I was "here" and Knew I was here (or was *ready* to know WHY and WHAT FOR!!). I also had the perception that I had been "led" to that point by the Entity I perceived to be "guiding" Me at that time in My life, as some indication from Him that I was "ready" for what that experience would bring into My life and Work, and had proven to Him My "worthiness". Of course, for Me, "before the event" was eleven years ago, and I perceived *everything* quite differently then from the way I do now. Still, plus ca change, plus ces la meme chose (excuse the lack of cedillas ) >>>I feel that I am overlooking something a bit obvious but of course >>>I'm not sure what yet. Not knowing your views on the subject, I don't know if I would assess you as overlooking anything or not, let alone what that thing would be. What are your views on it, your answers to the Q's you posed? Thanks for "initiating" an interesting thread of discussion! 93 93/93 Shedona ------------------------------------------------------------ also From: Shedona Chevalier M. M. asked: >>>One question: Here: >there are enough focused points and cohesive >substance in a degree to produce some across-the-board touchstones of >similarity, you appear to be saying that the similarities are the genuine quality experiences. Considering the rest of your post, I'm not sure that's what you meant. What did you mean when you called the across-the-board similarities the touchstones? I would have thought that every lesson learned by an individual through initiation would be a touchstone, at least for that individual. >>> No, that's not what I meant. I was simply pointing out that there were those two aspects in initiation, one being the personal or inner and the other being those shared things that form a "common ground" for folks of any particular degree to discuss their personal and inner unfoldings in the language of the particular symbolism and context of that degree, using that as a basis. I wasn't holding the one as having more quality or value than the other. The inward touchstones definitely present themselves as more "key" to the individual; the common context can be utilized (if one wills to do so) to provide a framework of objectification thereof, or a point of projection for the inward. It can be amazing (and sometimes amusing) to see what people project from within upon the external source of their initiation! 93 93/93 Shedona
SEARCH THIS SITE:
a local search engine and a named link to each Lucky Mojo page
Lucky Mojo Site Map: a descriptive entry-level index to the whole Lucky Mojo pile
Lucky W Amulet Archive Home Page: an online museum of folk-magic charms
Sacred Sex Home Page: essays on tantra yoga, karezza, sex magic, and sex worship
The Sacred Landscape HomePage: essays on archaeoastronomy and sacred geometry
Freemasonry for Women HomePage: a history of mixed gender freemasonic lodges
The Lucky Mojo Curio Co.: manufacturers of spiritual supplies for hoodoo and conjure
The Comics Warehouse: a source for back-issues of comic books and trading cards
catherine yronwode, the eclectic and eccentric author of all the above web pages
nagasiva yronwode: tyaginator, nigris (333), nocTifer, lorax666, boboroshi, !
The Lucky Mojo Esoteric Archive: captured internet files on occult and spiritual topics
The Lucky Mojo Esoteric Archive is copyright by the authors cited.
Send comments to the Esoteric Archivist: firstname.lastname@example.org.