Path: typhoon.sonic.net!feed.news.sonic.net!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!propagator2-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeed.com!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!twister.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Crescentia" Newsgroups: alt.magick References: Subject: Re: Is will necessary for evocation/invocation? Lines: 22 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:43:43 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.73.155.180 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: twister.tampabay.rr.com 1031593423 24.73.155.180 (Mon, 09 Sep 2002 13:43:43 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 13:43:43 EDT Organization: RoadRunner - Tampa Bay Xref: typhoon.sonic.net alt.magick:317077 "Gavagai" wrote in message news:pan.2002.09.06.17.56.28.730148.2379@spammesidways.freeserve.co.uk... > Here's a question: is will necessary for evocation/invocation. For > example, if one were simply to 'go through the motions' of a ritual, but > without willing any results, would the results occur? Or if one were > without will to repeat words that would normally bring about > evocation/invocation -- say if one had a neurological tic that caused the > words to be blurted out or thought against one's will (science fiction > example, I know, but it makes the point)-- would results > occur? hmmm - interesting question. To me, the will (and visualizations) are more important than the words, so I would tend to think you wouldn't get any results. I've done some very successful spells without words at all - just through thought and visualization. -- Crescentia )o()o()o()o()o()o()o()o()o( http://wiccawisdom.netfirms.com