Path: ultra.sonic.net!bug.rahul.net!207.0.229.10.MISMATCH!rahul.net!a2i!newsfeed.erinet.com!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!209.208.190.2!news.globix.net!news.idt.net!nntp.farm.idt.net!news
From: Ardie Von Störenfried <ardent10@idt.net>
Newsgroups: alt.zen
Subject: Re: Zen and Taoism
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 11:14:18 -0500
Organization: konpon bukkyō
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <36F90F56.506F@idt.net>
References: <01be74c7$22c4f680$668801d4@default> <36F72899.BDE09EC8@worldnet.att.net> <36F7C7CC.D82EF7A7@pathcom.com>
Reply-To: ardent10@idt.net
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-23.ts-1.atl.idt.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0-C-AICK1-2 (Macintosh; U; PPC)
Xref: ultra.sonic.net alt.zen:128664

Tjn wrote:

[snip]

> Hu Shih (the most radical voice: he did not believe Ch'an was Buddhism at all,
> but a revolt against it!)

Not exactly Toshu.  He actually said:

"Chinese Zennism arose not out of Indian yoga or dhyana but as a revolt
atainst it." (*The Chinese Social and Political Science Review*, XV, 4
January, 1932)


AS