Path: typhoon.sonic.net!bug.rahul.net!rahul.net!a2i!news.kjsl.com!news.new-york.net!newshub.northeast.verio.net!verio!netnews.com!newsfeed.enteract.com!news.enteract.com!not-for-mail
From: p0ok@enteract.com (5X3)
Newsgroups: alt.satanism
Subject: Re: Questions for Red
Date: 18 Jan 2000 19:06:29 GMT
Organization: EnterAct L.L.C. Turbo-Elite News Server
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <862djl$snb$1@eve.enteract.com>
References: <8624pd$avs$1@news.inet.tele.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.80.31.58
User-Agent: tin/1.4.1-19991201 ("Polish") (UNIX) (Linux/2.2.12-20 (i686))
Xref: typhoon.sonic.net alt.satanism:136641

- wolf - <herr_wolf@spamproof.com> wrote:
> Red,

> (4)  If your organization, "The Australian Satanic Council," is intended to
> encompass all kinds of Satanism (I'm using the term loosely here), why is it
> that the Church of Satan, without whom you would never have thought of
> calling yourself a Satanist in the first place, distinguishes itself as
> particularly difficult to fit within your organization?

This is a very common mistake.  Satanism did indeed exist prior to the 
invention of the church of satan, as tina louise graciously illustrates.




p0ok